Biondo v. Biondo
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGleicher, J.
James Franklin Biondo and Mary Lynne Biondo were married for more than 40 years. Their consent judgment of divorce equally divided the marital estate and required them to “equalize their social security benefits.” When Mary Biondo sought a court order compelling performance of the judgment’s social security provision, James Biondo asserted that federal law preempted its enforcement. The circuit court ruled that “[a] deal is a deal,” and declined to strike the social security provision from the divorce judgment. We granted leave to appeal to consider whether federal law preempts the consent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. KanaanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Sparks v. SparksMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Etefia v. Credit Technologies, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Buczkowski v. BuczkowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chateau Foghorn LP v. HosfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Dunmore v. DunmoreAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- In re Marriage of MuellerIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
- In re the Marriage of HeraldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Yann Iannucci v. Julie Michelle JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019