Legal Opinion
Seymour v. Picus
New York Court of Common Pleas
Decided June 4, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from first district court. Action by Stephania S. Seymour and another against Louis Picus and another. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover the sum of $154.71 from the defendants, being the amount paid by them for concreting the cellar floor of premises No. 504 Canal street in compliance with the order of the board of health of the city of New York. On retrial it Appeared that the defendants had leased the premises of the plaintiffs, who were the owners, for a term of five years, which lease contained the following covenant:
“And the said parties of the second part further agree to make all repairs of any and every kind and nature to the premises hereby demised, except to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ernst v. . CrosbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Scott v. Haverstraw Clay & Brick Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Hull v. BurnsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1885
- Buhler v. GibbonsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1889
- Barnum v. PatrickNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lindsay Bros., Inc. v. Milwaukee Cold Storage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Williamsburgh Power Co. v. ShottenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
- 10 Suf Realty, Inc. v. Irving FinsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1951