Legal Opinion

Herlihy v. New York City Loft Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*185Determination of respondent New York City Loft Board, dated March 18, 2004, finding that respondent Weadick is a protected loft tenant and that petitioner Horowitz’s purchase of an outgoing tenant’s improvements should be set aside, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Barbara R. Kapnick, J.], entered January 19, 2005) dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence, including the statement in Weadick’s collateral assignment denying that she was a member of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Rima 106, L.P. v. AlvarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. 2084-2086 BPE Associates v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 97 Wooster Corp. v. Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API