Legal Opinion

Choplosky v. Choplosky

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 1990No. 1684PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this appeal, we are called upon to determine whether a trial court may act to permanently modify a custody order without having before it a formal petition to modify filed by one of the parties. We find that it cannot and vacate.

The relevant facts and procedural history of this case may be summarized as follows. On April 11, 1984, Mr. and Mrs. Choplosky were divorced. Pursuant to the divorce, the parties agreed by a provision incorporated into the divorce decree to share both legal and physical custody of their three children.

Subsequently, the court entered an order directing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Mining Ass'n v. Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Soja v. Factoryville Sportsmen's ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. S.W.D. v. S.A.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Langendorfer v. SpearmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. P.H.D. v. R.R.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Everett v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. E.B. v. D.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API