Legal Opinion

Cox v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1875PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] We should be sorry to find that there is any rule of law which prevents our giving effect to the stipulation made by the counsel for the defendant on his application to postpone the trial at the Circuit held in February, 1872. The cause was then at issue, and was ready for trial on the part of the plaintiff's testator, who was then living, but was in feeble health; and the stipulation was tendered by the defendant's counsel, at the suggestion of the counsel for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kneettle v. . NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Beers v. . HendricksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Gaillard v. SmartNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  4. Lyon v. HoffmanNew York Supreme Court · 1833

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Fletcher's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Smith v. BarnesThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894
  3. Southern Kansas Railway Co. v. PaveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  4. Brown v. WarrenNevada Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Hunt v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API