Olian v. Random House, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.
This is a motion by plaintiff to examine one of the defendants before trial. The action is for libel. Prior to 1952, examinations in libel actions were not favored (Welling v. Kugel, 215 App. Div. 770). In that year rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice was promulgated and provided for such examination “ in any action ”. This language was taken to mean that the exception to examination in defamation cases was no longer to be recognized (Bissell v. Winchell, 205 Misc. 877; Tweed v. New York World-Telegram Corp., N. Y. L. J., June 24, 1953, p. 2111, col. 3). Then on March 10, 1954, the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Welling v. KugelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Bissell v.WinchellNew York Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nomako v. AshtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Kenyon v. Lord & Taylor, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Roma v. Newspaper Consolidated Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963