Legal Opinion
Silver & Goldstein v. Ridley-Yates Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 20, 1928No. 6101PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHjxl, J.
1. “No special form of words is necessary to make an assignment of a chose in action. Any language, however informal, if it shows the intention of the owner of the chose in action to at once transfer it, so that it will be the property of the transferee, will be sufficient to *50vest tlie title in tile assignee.” Southern Mutual Life Ins. Asso. v. Durdin, 132 Ga. 495 (64 S. E. 264, 131 Am. St. R. 210).
No. 6101. February 20, 1928. Rehearing denied March 3, 1928. Wolver M. Smith and Horace & Frank Holden, for plaintiffs. Pemberton Cooley, for defendants.(a) Under the requirements of this rule a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Saul v. BowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Southern Mutual Life Insurance v. DurdinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Comer Bank v. Meador-Cauthorn Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCann v. Dixie Lake & Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Macon National Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Kronstadt v. Citizens & Southern Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Southern Wholesale Corp. v. PincusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931