Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Michael Smith v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 24, 2015No. 4D13-512Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partForst, J.

I concur with respect to the holding that the trial court erred in imposing a public defender fee without notice. However, I respectfully disagree with the majority opinion that the trial judge erred in' reducing the charge of aggravated battery to attempted aggravated battery rather than simple battery. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.510(b) states in pertinent, part that “[t]he judge shall not instruct on any lesser included offense as to which there is no evidence” (emphasis added). In the instant case, I cannot conclude that there was “no evidence” on which a jury could find the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. FranchiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Zellars v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Keyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API