Legal Opinion

(PC) Anderson v. Beregovskaya

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 30, 2021No. 1:21-cv-01451Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES HENRY ANDERSON, ) Case No. 1:21-cv-01451-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION 13 v. ) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST THE 14 DR. OLGA BEREGOVSKAYA, ) ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff James Henry Anderson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed September 29, 2021. 21 I. 22 SCREENING…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Wilhelm v. RotmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API