Legal Opinion
State v. Brooks
Nebraska Court of Appeals
Decided February 18, 1997No. A-96-417PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*465Miller-Lerman, Chief Judge.
Larry D. Brooks appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, crack cocaine, a violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-416(3) (Cum. Supp. 1994). For the reasons recited below, we affirm.
FACTS
On August 15, 1995, at about 12:05 a.m., Omaha police officers James Paul and Steve Orsi were patrolling in a marked cruiser in the area of 30th and Pratt Streets in Omaha. Officer Paul testified that while patrolling, he noticed a person, later identified as Brooks, urinating while facing the interior wall of a carwash. On cross-examination, Officer Paul…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GutierrezNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. MillerNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. KinneyNebraska Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. BrooksNebraska Court of Appeals · 1997