Legal Opinion

Ex parte Haruye Suzuki

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 4, 1929No. 9758-MPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, District Judge.

This ease involves the question of the right of a J apanese woman to enter the United States for the first time under the claim that she is so entitled because her husband has the status of a treaty trader or merchant. A discussion of the Immigration Law, as it affects J apanese women under the circumstances claimed, is contained in the opinion filed in this court this day, in the habeas corpus matter of Naoe Minamiji, No. 9757-M, 36 F.(2d), 422. It will not be necessary to repeat here the views as expressed in the ease referred to. The facts, however, as they are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte Naoe MinamijiDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carr v. IkemotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  2. Susuki v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API