Legal Opinion

Ayala Vasquez v. Barr

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 3, 2020No. 18-1816Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-1816 Ayala Vasquez v. Barr BIA Connelly, IJ A209 836 920 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Victor Paul v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Xiu Xia Lin v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. Jigme Wangchuck v. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Ming Shi Xue v. Board of Immigration Appeals, U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API