Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Keller

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 18, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSweedler, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiffs, who are the attorneys for the defendant’s wife, to recover compensation for services rendered by them as such attorneys in moving to punish the defendant for contempt of court for failing to pay alimony, and for opposing motion to reduce alimony. The services rendered by the plaintiffs were subsequent to the entry of a judgment and decree separating the defendant from his wife. The decree of separation fixed the amount of alimony to be paid.

I am of the opinion that plaintiffs cannot recover for the services above mentioned. Alimony, when awarded,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turner v. . WoolworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Crittenden v. SchermerhornMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldberg v. KellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API