Luscher v. Morris
New York Supreme Court
Reference to ascertain and report the amount due to the defendants and claimants, George W., Charles T., Frank P.j and Charles H. Crouch, or to any other person, which is a lien upon the surplus moneys herein, and to ascertain the priorities of the several liens thereon, under rule 64 of the General Buies of Practice.
1Opinion of the Court
Henry J. Sullivan, Referee
The question here to be determined is, whether or not the two several mechanic’s lien notices filed by the defendants Crouch on November 28 and December 11, 1885, were valid and effectual notices of lien under chapter 342 of the Laws of 1885.. It is claimed on the part of the defendants Strauchen and Eaton and Pike, that said Crouch liens failed to comply with section 4 of said chapter, and were and are therefore invalid as against their liens, the notices of which in all respects comply with said section. The notices filed by the defendants Crouch were evidently…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Otis v. . DoddNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Husted v. . MathesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re EmslieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1900
- Brandt v. VerdonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
- Vogel v. LuitwielerNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Bossert v. HappelNew York Supreme Court · 1903