Legal Opinion

Omicron Co. v. Hansen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1943No. 28492PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

— This action was brought to compel specific performance of a provision in a lease for an appraisal of the leased premises. The court sustained a demurrer to the amended complaint, plaintiff refused to plead further, and judgment was entered dismissing the action, from which judgment this appeal has been taken.

On April 30, 1929, the respondent, Anna D. Hansen, a widow, leased to the Continental Investment Company, a corporation, an undivided one-half interest in certain real property located in Everett, Washington, for a stipulated monthly rental. The term of the lease was ninety-nine years.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Montgomery Gas-Light Co. v. City Council of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Farmington Village Corp. v. Farmington Water Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bogomolov v. Lake Villas Condominium Ass'n of Apartment OwnersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Bogomolov v. LAKE VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API