Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 18, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Purdy, J., Hampton, fall term, 1902. Indictment against Henry Jackson. From sentence, defendant appeals. cite: 3 Green. Ev., sec. 137; 1 Id., sec. 13a; 19 Id., 235; 6 'S. C., 187; 15 S. C., 158; 7 S. C., 63; 3 S. C., 396.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

1 At the fall term, 1902, of the Court of General Sessions for Hampton County, the defendant was convicted of stealing a sheep. In charging the jury, the presiding Judge said: “So far as circumstantial evidence is concerned, if it convinces your minds of the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt, it is just as satisfactory evidence as any other evidence. I charge you in reference to' that, however, that when one seeks to convict on circumstantial evidence, you must be satisfied of the guilt of the defendant beyond a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API