Legal Opinion
Reale v. Kiepper
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 3, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barry Hurowitz, J.), entered March 9, 1992, which granted respondents’ motion for reargument and renewal and upon said reargument and renewal, adhered to its original decision which granted petitioners’ motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining the posting of disciplinary dispositions of Transit Authority Police Officers, is unanimously modified, on the law and facts, and upon the grant of reargument, the motion for a preliminary injunction is denied, without costs or disbursements.
In July, 1991, respondents indicated that they were either…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Capital Newspapers Division of the Hearst Corp. v. BurnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Carpenter v. City of PlattsburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Carpenter v. City of PlattsburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Powhida v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Capital Newspapers Division of Hearst Corp. v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Doe v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Hoey v. KuchlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- 35 New York City Police Officers v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Feliciano v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1997
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1995