Legal Opinion

Brown v. Birdsall

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1859PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Roosevelt, P. J.

This action, and all the issues in it, were referred to Mr. Scudder to hear and determine, on motion of the defendants Birdsall and Mather, who now complain of the referee’s report, having taken, it is stated, “ more than one hundred exceptions to his decisions” in the course of the trial. These exceptions the plaintiff’s counsel has classified under various heads; some as “ unfounded some as “ nullitiessome as “ frivolous,” and some as “ simply nonsensical.” As they are all, or nearly all, more or less connected with the pervading one arising out of an alleged “…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kittredge v. LangleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Crehan v. . MegargelNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Pinschower v. HanksNevada Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Woodhouse v. . DuncanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Larison v. HagerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API