Legal Opinion

Validata Chemical Services v. United States Department of Energy

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 11, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2013-1882PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge

In 2011, Defendant Department of Energy (“DOE”) awarded a contract for environmental remediation services to URS %CO CH2M Oak Ridge, LLC (“UCOR”). In 2012, Plaintiff Validata Chemical Services (“Validata”) bid on, but did not win, a small business set-aside subcontract for data validation services to support UCOR’s remediation work. Validata then sought to contest the award of the subcontract to its competitor, Portage, Inc., arguing that Portage did not meet the applicable size standard for the small business set-aside…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. percipient.ai, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
  2. Acuity-Chs Middle East, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
  3. Aero Spray, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  4. Alphapointe v. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  5. Appalachian Voices v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API