Legal Opinion

State v. Phams

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 21, 1983No. 68561PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAREIS, Justice.

Defendant appeals his convictions of first degree murder of two Waterloo policemen. He assigns two errors: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support submitting certain jury instructions; and (2) the trial court should have suppressed defendant’s inculpatory testimony, given at the separate trial of an accomplice. We affirm the trial court.

Shortly before midnight on July 12, 1981, Waterloo police officers Michael Hoing and Wayne Rice, in response to a complaint about loud music, stopped at the home of defendant Joseph Phams. A number of people were on the front porch of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. CullisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  2. State v. ConnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. State v. AldapeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. State v. LottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State Of Iowa Vs. Robert L. HanesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  3. State v. McPhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  4. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. State v. RaglandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API