Forbes v. Hicks
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Harlan county. Tried below before .Gaslin, J. cited: In re Manchester, 5 Cal., 237; Bishop Crim. Pro., vol. 1, sec. 222; Poulk v. Slocum, 3 Blackf. (Ind.), 422. cited: People, ex rel. Lawrence, v. Brady, 56 N. Y., 182; Ex parte White, 49 Cal., 433; Smith v. State, 21 Neb., 552 • Cooley oh Torts, 173.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
This case was tried in the district court of Harlan co.unty and brought to this court to review the judgment below, on error.
The plaintiff below alleged that on February 28, 1887, the defendants unlawfully, and with force, assaulted and imprisoned him, and detained him in prison for the space of six days without reasonable or probable cause, to his damage for expenses of defense of $50 and of $1,950 for interruption of his business and for bodily and mental suffering.
The defendants, Forbes and Mason, answered, denying all the allegations and averments of the plaintiff.
There was a trial to a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by5 opinions
- Neves v. CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Smith v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Schoette v. DrakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Reichman v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- State ex rel. Grass v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1905