Legal Opinion

Prince Michael Corp. v. Zucker

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 11, 1962No. 62-261PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants, defendants in the trial court, seek review of an adverse final judgment based upon a jury verdict in a personal injury action. They have also raised the question of the propriety of certain costs awarded the plaintiff in the trial court, by virtue of an amended order taxing costs. The appellee has conceded the questioned costs were erroneous, thus the only point preserved for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

The verdict in the instant case, as in all cases, comes before this court clothed with the presumption of correctness, and we must review…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. TindellSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc. v. VallarelliDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Booker v. LimaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. FED. DETECTIVE AGENCYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Jefferson Stores, Inc. v. CaudellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Direct Transport Company of Florida v. RakaskasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  5. Lee v. Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API