Legal Opinion

United States v. Pope

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided March 23, 1966No. Cr. 443LPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN PELT, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the application of Messrs. Robert B. Crosby and Wallace M. Rudolph for an allowance of attorneys’ fees and expenses and upon the separate applications of individuals hereafter named for allowances of defense services. This was an extensive proceeding brought on by extraordinary circumstances in the case, as demonstrated by the demand on the part of the Government for the death penalty. For this reason an allowance of fees in excess of the normal statutory limits for an attorney in a felony case is just and proper. In order to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Gordon R. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  2. Loyd Carl Ray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  3. Thomas Winford Simmons v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
  5. People v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API