Commonwealth v. Doyle
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtLaurence, J.
On December 15, 2003, a jury in Superior Court found the defendant, James Doyle, guilty of having trafficked in *847cocaine in an amount greater than fourteen grams but less than twenty-eight grams on July 8, 1999.1 On January 9, 2004, the defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which the motion judge (who was also the trial judge) denied without a hearing on May 20, 2005. The defendant, who relied on an entrapment defense at trial, here contends (appealing both his conviction and the denial of his motion for a new trial) that the judge should have granted him a new trial on the grounds that…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MadiganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. CaraballoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. BuswellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. LockwoodMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019