Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Doyle

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 21, 2006No. 05-P-847PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaurence, J.

On December 15, 2003, a jury in Superior Court found the defendant, James Doyle, guilty of having trafficked in *847cocaine in an amount greater than fourteen grams but less than twenty-eight grams on July 8, 1999.1 On January 9, 2004, the defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which the motion judge (who was also the trial judge) denied without a hearing on May 20, 2005. The defendant, who relied on an entrapment defense at trial, here contends (appealing both his conviction and the denial of his motion for a new trial) that the judge should have granted him a new trial on the grounds that…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MadiganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. CaraballoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. BuswellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. LockwoodMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API