Legal Opinion

ESCOBAR

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2007No. ID 3572PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

24 I&N Dec. 231

(BIA 2007) Interim Decision #3572 In re Kattia Guadalupe ESCOBAR, Respondent File A75 504 052 - San Diego Decided July 11, 2007 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A parent’s lawful permanent resident status cannot be imputed to a child for purposes of calculating the 5 years of lawful permanent residence required to establish eligibility for cancellation of removal under section 240A(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(1) (2000). FOR RESPONDENT: Christopher J. Stender, Esquire, San…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. National Ass'n of Real Estate BoardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Enrique Cuevas-Gaspar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Neil Monet v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. KOLOAMATANGIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2003
  5. Benjamin Lepe-Guitron v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Holder v. Martinez GutierrezSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. De Leon-Ochoa v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. Aponte v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  4. Augustin v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Mercado-Zazueta v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API