Legal Opinion
IN THE MATTER OF K.S.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 28, 2017No. 114,076PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reif, J.,
¶ 1 The question presented to this Court is whether the distinct court abused its discretion when it denied Appellant’s (Biological Mother) May 20, 2015, second motion for reconsideration. We answer in the negative.
¶ 2 On November 19, 2013, the distinct court terminated Biological Mother’s parental rights to K.S. (Child). 1 Biological Mother appealed the termination order in 112,425 and it was affirmed by the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals on January 16, 2015. On February 13, 2015, mandate issued. 2 After mandate issued in 112,425, Child was adopted by Parents. 3
¶ 3 On April 7,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- SMITH v. CITY OF STILLWATERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Bierman v. Aramark Refreshment Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Red Arrow Marina Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Brigman v. CheneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Kerr v. ClarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- GRISHAM v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- BAUGHMAN v. WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025
- BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.