Legal Opinion
Eckstein v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The sole issue made by the pleadings prior to the amendment of the complaint was whether it was the duty of the defendant to apply the dividend accumulations in its hands, in purchasing extended term insurance under the non-forfeiture provisions, so as to keep the policy in force. Provision 12-c of the policy reads as follows:
“Upon default in payment of premium, unless paid within the grace period, the amount of this policy and any existing dividend additions, less any indebtedness to the company on account hereof, shall be extended automatically as nonparticipating term insurance for such…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Williams v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Leonard v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Elton v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- McNaughton v. Des Moines Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dunn v. Pertzsch Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Eberle v. Joint School District No. 1Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Eliason v. Production Credit Association of AitkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Rice v. GruetzmacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Baker v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945