Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bass v. First Alabama Bancshares

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 13, 1989No. 86-1259Published

1Dissent

The plaintiffs' lawsuit was filed prior to the merger. The damages claimed by the plaintiffs in their individual capacity are premised solely upon "depletion in value of their stock." Therefore, I agree with the majority that the individual claims were properly dismissed. See Gregory v. Mitchell, 459 F. Supp. 1162,1165 (M.D.Ala. 1978). No other loss has been alleged. Cf.Shelton v. Thompson, 544 So.2d 845 (Ala. 1989) (Torbert, C.J., dissenting) (impairment of shareholders' right to dissent from merger proposal would support individual cause of action). I therefore concur in that portion of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Lewis v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. deHaas v. Empire Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  4. Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Albany & Susquehanna RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Newton v. Hornblower, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API