Legal Opinion

State v. Renzulli

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 2010No. 32A04-1003-CR-194PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION1

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Plaintiff, State of Indiana, appeals the trial court's suppression of the evidence obtained after the stop of the vehicle that Appellee-Defendant, Amanda Renzulli (Renzulli), was driving.

We affirm.

ISSUE

The State presents one issue, which we restate as: Whether the trial court's grant of Renzullis motion to suppress is contrary to law.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

At approximately 1:00 a.m. on April 23, 2009, a caller phoned 911 and stated, "there is a drunk driver in front of me. He's all over the road and he's going to kill somebody."…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
State v. QuirkIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
State v. WashingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

State v. RenzulliIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
State v. RenzulliIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
State v. RenzulliIndiana Supreme Court · 2011