Legal Opinion

Anthony Dorsett v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 3, 2015No. 4D15-144PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion. Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla.2011); Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). “[R]eview of the record establishes that the defendant did not satisfy the burden of showing entitlement to relief on the face of the record.” Johnson, 60 So.3d at 1051 n. 2. Appellant’s second claim is meritless as the alleged disproportionality between his sentence, and the sentence of his co-defendant, does not establish an “illegal sentence” cognizable under rule 3.800(a). Shivers v. State, 96 So.3d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 4th…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  2. Shivers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Casteel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. DERRICK J. ANDERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. ERIC DAMON GORDON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  5. Gordon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API