Legal Opinion

Kim v. Metropolitan Atlanta Olympic Games Authority

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 24, 1997No. A97A1096PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

The Metropolitan Atlanta Olympic Games Authority (MAOGA) instituted this condemnation proceeding. Kim and another condemnee appealed the special master’s award to superior court, asserting error in the determination that they cannot recover business losses because their leasehold property interests are not “unique.” The court entered judgment on the jury verdict which resolved the foregoing issue favorably to the other condemnee but adversely to Kim. Kim moved for new trial, asserting error in the court’s jury charge, and now appeals the denial of his motion.

1. The jury charge…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. 2.734 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Housing Authority v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Lewis v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Ply-Marts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Raiford v. Deparment of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. General Lighting Distributing, Inc. v. Cobb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API