Legal Opinion
NAHNO-LOPEZ v. Houser
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 20, 2009No. Case CIV-08-1147-FPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEPHEN P. FRIOT, District Judge.
“Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 19 of the Federal Rules” (doc. no. 10), and “Defendants’ Motion to Strike Claim for Relief Pursuant to Rule 12© of the Federal Rules” (doc. no. 11), are before the court. The briefing is complete, and the motions are ready to be determined.
Introduction
This action is brought by two sets of plaintiffs. “The Kerchee Plaintiffs” are alleged to comprise over fifty-one percent of the beneficial owners of Comanche Allotment No. 2329. The Kerchee Plaintiffs are alleged to be enrolled members of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Bellinger v. TrueDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Commissioner of the N.Y. State Dept. of Transp. v. PoliteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024