Legal Opinion
Habina v. M. A. Henry Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 6, 1948PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs move under Rule 14(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C. A. following Section 723c, for an order permitting them to serve a summons and amended complaint so as to state a claim against the third-party defendants implead-ed by the defendant M. A. Henry Co., a New York corporation. The third-party defendant Woonsocket Falls Mill, a Rhode Island corporation, urges that the proper venue of the proposed' action against it would be either Pennsylvania, the district of the plaintiffs’ residence, or Rhode Island, where Woonsocket Falls Mill was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Brown v. CranstonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Friend v. Middle Atlantic Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Hoskie v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- Thompson v. CranstonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alamida v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
- Sledge v. Town & Country Tire Centers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Abramovitch v. United States LinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Thompson v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Bonath v. Aetna Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.