Legal Opinion

Bell v. Commercial Inv. Trust Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 1, 1926No. 16777PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, O.

Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, inverse to their order here. The Commercial Investment Trust Company, Inc., alleged to be a conpolration, had judgment against defendant, Ev,ai II. Bell, on verdict of jury, for $474.27 and interest, as balance on a promissory conditional sales «contract, executed by defendant, Bell, to Mote Mctor Ooanpany for balance of purchase price of an lautomobile, and by that company, for value, assigned and delivered to plaintiff. Defendant filed verified denial of the corporate existence of plaintiff, admitted the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ward v. Minnesota & Northwestern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Swofford Bros. Dry Goods Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Black River Improvement Co. v. HolwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Rialto Co. v. MinerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Cámara Insular de Comerciantes Mayoristas v. LavanderoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API