Legal Opinion
In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 16, 1991No. 88 Civ. 3317 (RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Arlene Maiorana (“Maiorana”) has moved by letter to reconsider, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(2), the opinion of February 26, 1991, In re Joint Eastern and Southern District Asbestos Litigation (Maiorana), 758 F.Supp. 199 (S.D.N.Y.1991) (the “February Opinion”), which granted the motion of defendant Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (“OCF”) and others for summary judgment dismissing her claim based on her inability to show that her husband’s colon cancer was more probably than not the product of occupational exposure to asbestos. Maiorana…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Potamkin Cadillac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Juan Parrilla-Lopez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- In Re Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Maiorana v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Maiorana v. United States Mineral Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995