Hall v. Gittings's Lessee
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Error to the General Court. In this case there was a procedendo from the late court of appeals, directing a new trial of an action of ejectment, (which had been tried in the general court at May term 1800,) for 50 acres of arable land, 10 acres of meadow, and 100 acres of woodland, being part of a tract of land called Hitts Forest, situate in Baltimore county.
Read the full summary
Error to the General Court. In this case there was a procedendo from the late court of appeals, directing a new trial of an action of ejectment, (which had been tried in the general court at May term 1800,) for 50 acres of arable land, 10 acres of meadow, and 100 acres of woodland, being part of a tract of land called Hitts Forest, situate in Baltimore county. (See 1 Harr. 0? Johns. 14.) The defendant took defence for Cullen’s I¿oi, and Cullen’s Addition, on the plots made ’and returned. Judgment was entered against the casual ejector for all the lands undefended. ^ 1 r | L 1 1 , l 1 i 1, The…
1Opinion of the Court
The Court,
at this term, dissented from the opinions of the General Court in the first and second bills of exceptions, and concurred with that in the third bill of exceptions. Rut the court were of opinion, that the certificate of the clerk of Prince-George’s county court gave an authority to the clerk of Baltimore county court to record the deed from Ogle and wife to Bosley, mentioned in the first bill of exceptions, the court considering the words “legally authorised and assigned,” within the meaning of the act of November li'66, ch. 14.
JUDGMENT REVERSE».
2Cited by7 opinions
- Fouke v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
- Friend v. HamillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
- Warner v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
- Marlow v. McCubbinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
- Malone v. LongCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.