Legal Opinion

State v. Bradshaw

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 10, 2004No. 20020137-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

99 P.3d 359 (2004)

2004 UT App 298

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Brooks BRADSHAW, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 20020137-CA.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

September 10, 2004.

Kent R. Hart and Robert K. Heineman, Salt Lake City, for Appellant.

Mark L. Shurtleff, Christine F. Soltis, and Charlene Barlow, Salt Lake City, for Appellee.

Before BILLINGS, P.J., ORME, and THORNE, JJ.

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

¶ 1 Defendant Brooks Bradshaw was charged with eleven counts of communications fraud, second degree felonies in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-10-1801 (2003), and one count of pattern of unlawful…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API