Legal Opinion
Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. Cooper
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 4, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
This is an action for the infringement of Claims 7 and 8 of patent No. 1,967,221 granted July 24, 1934, in the names of William R. Allen and Emmett C. Hartley, of which the plaintiff is the owner.
The individual defendants deny validity and infringement of the patent. The corporate defendant concedes infringement if the claims are valid.
*698The individual defendants were parties to a consent decree entered in this court January 25, 1939, in a former action brought by this plaintiff against the individual defendants. It states that it is decreed that the patent is valid as to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Pope Manufacturing Co. v. GormullySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Nachman Spring-Filled Corporation v. Kay Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. American Neon Light CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946