Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Galbraith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 1922No. 6830. [fn*]Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

In his motion for rehearing, calling attention to authorities no^ theretofore cited, appellant challenges the holding in the original opinion that he had waived his plea of privilege by not calling it to the attention of the trial court during the term at which it was filed, and by permitting it to be continued without reserving the right to present. it at subsequent terms of the court.

Upon further consideration,' we have concluded that in deference to the decisions now cited by appellant the motion for rehearing should be granted, and the judgment of the court below…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Wichita Mill & Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Bennett v. Rose Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Wallace v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Craig v. Pittman & Harrison Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Galewsky v. W. R. Kyser Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API