Cook v. Municipal Court of Pine Bluff
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Per curiam
Although not so entitled, this pro se petition is in substance a motion for a rule to direct the clerk to file a transcript without requiring the petitioner either to pay the required filing fee or to submit proof of indigency.
It is argued that the petitioner is entitled to proceed without paying a filing fee because the Arkansas Constitution provides in Article 2, § 13, that every person “ought to obtain justice freely, and without purchase.” That same interpretation of the Constitution was urged in Marshall v. Holland, 168 Ark. 449, 270 S.W. 609 (1925), where it was argued that under that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Marshall v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
3Cited by7 opinions
- LeCroy v. HanlonTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Carrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
- Fent v. State ex rel. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Fent v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF HUMAN SVCS.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.