Legal Opinion

In Re the Accounting of Livingston Platt

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cardozo, Ch. J.

The State of Connecticut has petitioned the Surrogate’s Court of the county of New York to direct the executor of a will to remit the assets of the estate to an administrator c. t. a., apnointed in Connecticut, the domicile of the testatrix. The return is requested for a single purpose. The purpose is to permit the assessment and collection in Connecticut of a tax upon the transfer effected by the will.

The Surrogate in denying the petition placed his ruling upon two grounds. He held that to return the assets for such a purpose would be equivalent to the enforcement by one State…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Blackstone v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Baldwin v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Beidler v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. City of Philadelphia v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. In re the Accounting of GerdauNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  4. In re the Estate of HastingsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944
  5. In re the Estate of CornellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API