Legal Opinion

State v. Parker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1987No. 362A86PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant first assigns error to the trial court’s failure to find as a mitigating factor that he was a passive participant or played a minor role in the commission of the second degree murder. He contends that in our first decision in this case and in State v. Jones, 309 N.C. 214, 306 S.E. 2d 451 (1981), this Court ig*447nored the plain meaning of N.C.G.S. § 15A-1340.4(a)(2)c which provides for this mitigating factor. He argues that this Court has made the determination of this mitigating factor depend on whether the defendant attempted to dissuade his codefendant from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HartnessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. WamplerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API