Legal Opinion

Conner v. Watson

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to compel a referee in partition to pay money.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

Caroline M. Conner, who makes this motion, is one of the four plaintiffs in the partition action in which the motion is made. She is entitled in trust to distributive shares in the several parcels of land sought to be partitioned, and is also owner and holder of a mortgage upon one of these parcels. The . money in dispute, amounting to $10,820, was paid by the referee to her attorney of record in the suit, one Nelson, who never turned it over to her. This motion seeks to compel the referee to pay the entire amount of the mortgage, $14,000, with interest. He is willing to pay the difference,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gorham v. GaleNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  2. Kellogg v. GilbertNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  3. Davis v. . BoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Steward v. . BiddlecumNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  5. Central Trust Co. v. FolsomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. National Union InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
  2. Altenau v. MastersonNew York City Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API