Legal Opinion · Dissent

National Bank of Newberry v. Livingston

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 13, 1930No. 12854Published

1Dissent

Mr. Acting Associate Justice Graydon

(dissenting) : I regret that I am unable to concur with the leading opinion in this case and I will state the reasons for my dissent.

The statement of facts contained in the opinion of Mr. Justice Cothran are in the main correct as to material points except as to a statement on pages 2 and 3 that the Icard deed covers the timber on the Cooley place. This is a perfectly natural mistake, as will be shown herein, for the reason that the recitation in the Wheeler mortgage stated that the same was the identical tract of land on which Mrs. Livingston had recently…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Ochoa v. Hernandez Y MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Cordova v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Kirsch v. . TozierNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Simms v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API