Legal Opinion

Lambert v. La Conner Trading & Transportation Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1902No. 4439PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. William R. Bell, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

The appellant (plaintiff) brought this action against the respondent to recover damages for personal injuries received by him while in the employ of. the company, caused by the alleged negligence of the company in running' its steamer into a drawbridge. The case was tried by a jury, and, upon the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony, the court, on motion of the defendant, granted a nonsuit on the ground that the testimony introduced by the plaintiff did not show negligence on the part of the defendant. The cause was dismissed, and from said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Traver v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Steele v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Jordan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Burian v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walters v. Spokane International Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Dixon v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Swanson v. Pacific Shipping Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Cook v. Stimson Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Lambert v. LaConner Trading & Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API