Swope v. Fair
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Harrison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Suit upon a note.
Answer:
1. The general denial.
2. "Want of consideration.
3. Fraud, generally, in its procurement.
4. Fraud, setting out the facts.
5. Same as the fourth.
The third paragraph of the answer was bad. A general answer of fraud is not good. Fraud is shown by facts, and under the code they must be stated. The fourth and fifth paragraphs were stricken out on motion, and, not being incorporated in a bill of exceptions, are not before us. Ind. Dig. p. 649, sec. 174; Copple v. Helm, 15 Ind. 147.
The cause was tried by the Court on the first three paragraphs, and a judgment given for the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Copple v. HelmIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conwell v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Barner v. MoreheadIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- State ex rel. Cartwright v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Moyer v. BrandIndiana Supreme Court · 1885