Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Stowell, Chamberlain, & Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 9, 1862PublishedCited by 5 opinions

CASE 24 — PETITION ORDINARY cited 1 Met. 446; 2 Littell, 228, 229; 3 B. Mon. 423, 421; 9 lb., 507; 1 Greenleafs Ev. secs. 284, 304; 2 Parsons on Contracts, 66, 67, and note; 1 Mass., 297; 7 Mass., 518. cited 2 Met. 144, 148; 5 Mon., 273, 274.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIBE JUSTICE DUVALL

delivered the opinion op the court:

Stowell, Chamberlain & Co., as remote assignees of Crandle, brought this suit on a note executed by Taylor & Son to Cran-dle for $712 36.

*176The defendants answered, alleging in substance that the note was given as part of the consideration for a raft of pine lumber which they bought of Crandle, amounting, at the price agreed on, to $2,137 08, all of which had been paid except the amount of the note sued on; that at the time of the purchase and of the execution of the note, doubts were entertained as to the quality of the lumber; that it was…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Forbes & Bro. v. Cooper & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  2. Simons v. Douglas' Extr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Cross v. Snyder's Admx.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. M'Laughlin v. Detroit & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Sohier v. LoringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API