Legal Opinion

Leatherwood v. Richardson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1908No. Civil No. 1005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

, APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District, in and for the County of Pima. John H. Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. Rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtKent, C. J.

— At the last term of this court we affirmed the judgment in this case. As we pointed out in our opinion, the record showed that there was no assignment of errors, no statement of facts or bill of exceptions, except in the form of a transcript of the reporter’s notes; that such transcript had not been allowed by the trial judge, and hence could not be considered as a bill of exceptions; and that the appellant had in other particulars failed to comply with the requirements of the appellate procedure. The appellant presented a motion for rehearing, in which he showed that by inadvertence the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Costello v. CunninghamArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Sherrill v. City of PeoriaArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Costello v. GleesonArizona Supreme Court · 1918
  4. In re Contest of Election, City of NilesTrumbull County Probate Court · 1917
  5. Leatherwood v. RichardsonArizona Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API