Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Passiales

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 13, 1986No. 85-1294PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

Carolyn Passiales, the respondent in a divorce action, petitioned under section 72 of the Civil Practice Act, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110, par. 72 (now Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 110, par. 2—1401)), to have her divorce decree set aside for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In her petition, Carolyn also asked the court to find that the default judgment of divorce entered against her was void because the court lacked jurisdiction over her person. Finally, she requested leave to file an answer and a counterpetition for divorce against her husband.

The trial judge vacated Carolyn’s divorce…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Clemmons v. Travelers Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Blazina v. BlazinaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. In Re Marriage of KozloffIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hill v. HilesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  5. Sawicki v. KimAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Quinlan v. StouffeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Brooklyn Bagel Boys, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Lohman v. LohmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Prevendar v. ThonnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. In Re Marriage of ScafuriAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API