Legal Opinion

In re Goldman

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1917No. 4892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Aaron Goldman and another, individually and as copartners trading as Goldman Bros., bankrupts. On petition by J. Blumenthal, a creditor, to review an order of the referee authorizing the trustee to compromise a certain claim, due to him from the bankrupts.

1Opinion of the CourtBradford, District Judge

(specially presiding). This is a petition by J. Blumenthal, a creditor of Aaron Goldman and Frank Goldman, trading as Goldman Brothers, bankrupts, for the review of an order made by the referee December 21, 1916, purporting to authorize the trustee in bankruptcy to compromise a certain claim of $3,092.20 due to him from thp bankrupts, and also a certain claim of $40 due to him from the above named Aaron Goldman, by the payment to the trustee of the sum of $1,500 in full settlement of the two claims above mentioned. The portion of the referee’s order of December 21, 1916, relative to a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Lloyd, Carr and Company, Bankrupt (Two Cases). Appeal of Alan H. Abrahams. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  2. Gordon v. Hartford Sterling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. In re Ben L. Berwald Shoe Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API